[packagers] Re: [svn] r3600 - in trunk/rpms: . fmod
leet at leenx.co.za
Tue Oct 11 12:13:29 CEST 2005
Sorry for the late reply, been out of country for a few days ...
> I prefer to sign off packages by builders and consider it 'in
> progress' if not everyone has signed it off. (or at least hasn't
> been signed off by at least a few builders/packagers)
I too would prefer a sign off too, because at least somebody who knows
something about packaging would have taken a look at my mess in general,
but I too like to be able to see the history in svn ...
I often look at the spec file history in Dries repo with spev and
history viewer ...
I don't mind the tag been changed until approved either, it works for
me either way.
The fmod package will be needed by the UltimateStunts package, if I
ever get it to work for me ... Think it's a 64bit problem though ... So,
I thought it better to submit all the deps first, if they where not in
In the end, if I can't get UltimateStunts working, then I don't see the
need for fmod unless something else uses it, and with the less than nice
license, I would not push anybody else to use this lib ... Hope that is
not too harsh?
More information about the packagers