[packagers] Re: incompatible fftw-3-1.1 kde-redhat packaging
bent.terp at ki.se
Mon Oct 16 09:20:26 CEST 2006
On Friday 13 October 2006 18:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> > The problem is that your fftw is version 3.*, so you need to _rename_
> > your package to fftw3.
> >In other distros, fftw is version 2.*, but there
> > is no straight upgrade path from version 2 to version 3, so you can't
> > just upgrade the fftw package without breaking all the programs that
> > depend on it. Most distros I am aware of keep two versions fftw and
> > fftw3, which are able to live side-by-side.
Both fedoraextras and atrpms do it the same way as Rex describes, rpmforge
does it the way Morten wants.
Other distros - Suse, Mandriva, you name em - may have great merit in their
own, but little relevance to this discussion.
> Let me put it another way (bluntly): it's either the fftw(3) + fftw2 way
> or the highway. Which would you rather have?
My personal preference would be _one_ provider of fftw regardless of version -
or at least that all repos with fftw packages use the same numbering scheme.
But I realise that it is _not_ a trivial thing to achieve; maintaining
backwards compatibility without staying behind in the age of dinos.
Compromising usually leads to uniform discontent....
More information about the packagers