[packagers] el3 EOL

David Hrbáč hrbac.conf at seznam.cz
Tue Oct 5 12:11:33 CEST 2010

Dne 5.10.2010 11:50, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
> Yes, if you only consider the numbers we might drop RHEL3 and even PPC.
> On the other hand, if some people are interested to maintain it (and I
> foresee needing it from time to time myself) I think it is still useful.
I'm fine with Yuri's proposal, build packages for el{4-6} targets and
let's see if builds also on el3.

> That was indeed the plan. Remove Fedora and Aurora. Remove RH8 and RH9.
> Keep EL2 and RH7 archived. I haven't defined what archived means though.
> Would it be a subdirectory in the normal tree for archived stuff (that
> mirrors can exclude if they like) or is it a complete seperate tree ?

I don't find it appropriate solution. Should be moved out of the main
tree. We can provide multiple sources via rsync://. "Production" tree,
archive tree, etc.

More information about the packagers mailing list