[packagers] Infrastructure - migration to GitHub?

Dag Wieers dag at wieers.com
Mon Apr 11 17:09:41 CEST 2011


On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:22 +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>
>> I find this a brilliant idea and would support you by all means, but
>> personally I haven't used asciidoc (I use markdown instead) so I would
>> go for what I used :-) But if you are saying asciidoc, let it be
>> asciidoc.
>
> By the way, I checked up on that and I have found no mention of GitHub
> supporting asciidoc in particular :-/ I have got the impression that
> Markdown is all it supports.
>
> Could you please give me a pointer?

Git is one of the projects that started to us asciidoc for documentation. 
The kernel is another big project using asciidoc.

     http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc/msg/16456ba230b045ab

Read the thread, because they also added .adoc as an extension (something 
we discussed before).

-- 
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/

[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]



More information about the packagers mailing list