[packagers] after pull request

IWAI, Masaharu iwaim.sub at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 03:02:34 CEST 2012


I see.

"lv" package for CentOS 5 is "4.51-8.1". When we update CentOS 5 to CentOS 6,
we will reinstall lv package.
# "4.51-8.1" > "4.51-1.el6.rf"

2012/6/26 Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Denis Fateyev wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, IWAI, Masaharu <iwaim.sub at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for cleanup lv.spec.[1]
>>>
>>> But I found "lv-4.51-1.rf.src.rpm". The spec file included by 4.51-1
>>> is ''Release: 1%{?dist}".
>>> And I cannot find in rpmforge/rpms repository.[2]
>>>
>>> What has happened?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/6e876f768a547d2c7f71cc6dfd8e0990ab312423
>>> [2] https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commits/master/specs/lv/lv.spec
>>
>> Okay, the builder (Dag?) decided to start the numeration over. Not a big
>> deal.
>> Although it means we should correct the spec in the repo accordingly (??)
>
> Yes, when I found the problem I also fixed it. I started to count from 1
> because we don't want to get into some release-number war with EPEL. There
> have been accusations in the past that we use a repotag so our packages
> "win" (which is quite laughable because in most cases our packages have a
> lower release number anyway).
>
> If there has not been releases number 1 to 6, there is no point to start
> at 7.
>
> --
> -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
> -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
>
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
> _______________________________________________
> packagers mailing list
> packagers at lists.repoforge.org
> http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/packagers

-- 
IWAI, Masaharu



More information about the packagers mailing list