[users] SpamAssassin 3.1 in the EL4 branch?
quien-sabe at metaorg.com
Mon May 8 15:17:12 CEST 2006
Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Michael Best wrote:
> I guess I cannot please both sides and eventually I'm not pleasing neither
Which supports my earlier suggestion that rpmforge should include a second
repo for each distro named rpmforge-updates ( or something similiar ) where
packages that are part of the core are updated leaving it at the choice of
the user to decide if they want to stay strictly with the core packages or
stay update with new developements.
Simply my $0.02.
More information about the users