[users] Nagios 3?

Thomas Bleier tbleier2 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 18:47:15 CEST 2008


On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Hugo van der Kooij <
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Hi Hugo
> >
> > I have a spec file ready to release. I was just wondering if we should
> > announce it 1-2 Weeks in advance here.
>
> I was wondering if it should be released as nagios-3.0.4 package or
> nagios3-3.0.4 package.
>
> The latter one would not cause an overwrite without a deliberate action
> on the user end.
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG <http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG>? Use:
> http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>        A: Yes.
>        >Q: Are you sure?
>        >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>        >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFI92RtBvzDRVjxmYERAv3bAJ9J1VJ7QY4sPoK3wEMhORGfHxsETACfZtNe
> R1GJmAPavClxmRlR8wX63FA=
> =Q156
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.rpmforge.net
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
>

Hi,

I would opt for the nagios3-3.0.4 variant - gives everybody the chance for
"opting-in" to the new version if and when he likes to.

just my 2c,
__
/homas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081016/09bd00e2/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the users mailing list