[users] drbd83 still in testing

Angenendt, Ralph ralph.angenendt at br-online.de
Thu Aug 12 11:03:57 CEST 2010

On 08/11/2010 10:01 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 20:14 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> From what I understood they are actually wondering if you are interested
>>> in pulling their SPEC from ELRepo into Extras instead of maintaining
>>> your own package.
>> Not sure if that makes sense, as we don't produce RHEL4 packages it has no 
>> support for it (anymore). What I think is essential is that we track 
>> each other's changes. But for that we need a public versioning system.
> I guess it's up to Ralph to decide whether this makes sense or not. I
> didn't have a look at the package code so I have no clue how complicated
> is maintain some additional code to support RHEL4 in this case.

It's not complicated at all, after all CentOS has drbd packages for
CentOS 4.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100812/9bca6b7f/attachment.sig>

More information about the users mailing list