[suggest] Recent changes to RPMforge

Ingvar Hagelund ingvar at redpill-linpro.com
Fri Nov 26 13:27:02 CET 2010

* Dag Wieers
> RPMforge is a third-party repository for RHEL, CentOS and Scientific 
> Linux. It provides add-on RPM packages that increase functionality and 
> productivity for both Server and Desktop based environments. (...)

>   = RPMforge now consists of more than one repository:
>       + rpmforge - packages that _do not_ replace base packages
>                    (eg. nagios, wine, vlc, xine, mpg123, ...)
>       + rpmforge-extras - newer packages that _do_ replace base packages
>                           (eg. lftp, rsync, subversion, ...)
>       + rpmforge-testing - alternative test packages
>                            (eg. wine-1.3.x, ...)
>       + rpmforge-buildtools - packages required for building RPMforge pkgs
>                               (eg. bison, make, rpm-macros-rpmforge, ...)
>     For convenience, packages belonging to one of the above repositories
>     are tagged respectively with rf, rfx, rft and rfb distribution tags.

First: This is GREAT news. Thank you so much.

Second: This may be a FAQ, but anyway; will there be much overlap
between rpmforge and epel, or will you try to avoid parallell work by
skip packages that exists in epel? (In short: Is it a goal to make
rpmforge and epel more compatible?)

(I may ask the same question about the centos repos, but we can let that
be for now.)


More information about the users mailing list