[users] Re: ProFTPd Vulnerability

Andy Loughran andy at zrmt.com
Tue Nov 16 10:59:36 CET 2010


>From my perspective it'd probably be quite useful to be able to roll rpms
and submit them back to rpmforge in cases such as this one.  Could one of
you please let me know the process you've used for building the rpm?  I'll
look for the submission process on the website.



On 16 November 2010 09:05, David Hrbáč <hrbac.conf at seznam.cz> wrote:

> Dne 16.11.2010 9:59, Christoph Maser napsal(a):
> >
> > Actually I have a totally different problem. It seems that my build
> > system is broken. If it builds for you, just submit your update I will
> > thrwo mine away.
> > I don't mind the version number beeing 1.3.3c letters for patchlever
> > releases are not that uncommon (tzdata, openssl).
> Yes, I'm just not quite sure yum will consider 1.3.4>1.3.3c...
> DH
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.rpmforge.net
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101116/8174786c/attachment-0004.html>

More information about the users mailing list