[users] Request and a bug: gksu
Todd And Margo Chester
toddandmargo at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 21:35:40 CEST 2011
On 06/06/2011 01:18 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 11:47 -0700, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> Why? What am I missing? Older code is harmful, why? SL6
>> is all out-of-date anyway. What harm does one more out-of-date
>> app cause amongst the thousands of other out-of-date apps?
>> No dependencies were added. I do not get it. Please educate me.
> I consider this too basic Linux knowledge, to be elaborated on this
> list. The keywords are "linking", "ABI / API compatibility", "rpm
> versions" etc. Otherwise see Jim's comprehensive reply.
> You *might* get away with mixing packages *sometimes*, but at other
> times, it can cause anything in between software malfunctioning and
> catastrophic data loss. And very certainly, it is a bad idea for
> anything security related, such as gksu.
Thank you for your patience with me over my misunderstanding.
I am still stuck on if it is a security hazard in el6, why is it not also a
security hazard in el5? I presume that the dependencies in the RPM
would take care of anything that is different. The code itself is
still the code itself -- the code has not changed. If it is safe in one,
it should be safe in the other. I am clearly not getting your point.
More information about the users