[users] Subversion 1.6.17 srpm tools, for RHEL 4/5/6 compatible 1.6.x releases

Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 12:59:34 CEST 2012


On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Denis Fateyev <denis at fateyev.com> wrote:

> Hello Nico,
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Denis Fateyev <denis at fateyev.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm planning to integrate your 1.6.17 and 1.7.4 versions both (the first
>>> is for RHEL3/4 and the second is for using with newer RHELs), preliminarily
>>> flushing subversion directory in the repo from all outdated specs and
>>> patches. Are your subversion repos ready for the final integration? ;)
>>>
>>> If you can get 1.6.17 to compile for RHEL 3, I'm going to be really,
>> really surprised. I don't even have a test environment for that. If it
>> works, *great*.
>>
>
> I haven't got any RHEL3 machines in production, either, so I cannot check
> if it works!
> In case if it doesn't, we simply preserve the existing spec for RHEL3.
>
>
>
>>  Note that both 1.6.17 and 1.7.4 have a "filter-requires.sh" source file,
>> and it differs and should probably be renamed if you're going to put them
>> in the same directory.
>>
>
> Could you please alter filenames like "filter_requires_1.6.17.sh" and
> specs content accordingly (to copy from those files to proper ones during
> build)?
>

I just synchronized them, instead. The differences were small, and harmless
to merge. I also added a ".gitignore" so it wouldn't store the binaries or
tarballs as part of the git repository.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120410/3e06c8b8/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the users mailing list